Friday, September 18, 2015

US Minitruth subsidiary CNN ups the propaganda war to destroy Europe through immigration

On September 14, Germany temporarily suspended the Schengen agreement and reinstated border checks. This action became necessary due to Germany being overwhelmed by a massive, yet predictable "refugee" influx caused by Devila Merkel welcoming them all to Germany. This interruption and threat to the plan of destroying Europe through immigration, caused CNN to go into a temporary one day all-out propaganda war in order to try and resume the plan.

CNN used to be a somewhat respectable news website, but of course good things don't last and apparently neither do mediocre things. A first step was taken when CNN abolished the comments section under its articles. This is most partly due to complaints about racism (articles on race issues quickly turned very nasty) but even more due to opinions that were critical of the US ruling regime. Some commentators did not scream along in two minute hate sessions against Putin or asked critical questions regarding the alleged killing of Osama Bin Laden in Abbottabad.

In 2014 the largest change was effected when CNN changed the format of its website into a format seemingly more friendly towards mobile phones (larger items, so less fits) and changed the content as well into a loose ensemble of often nothing more than clickbait articles. The incessant reporting on Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 and crackpot theories like "black holes" and "Bermuda triangle" are but an example of the depths of garbage "reporting" that CNN sunk into.

As such, changing from merely clickbait articles interspersed with some serious issues, to a front page pretty much wholly dedicated to a single issue, not involving Americans or otherwise a major international disaster, is suspect. The following screenshot was taken on September 14:


"Woman with young child in trouble" cliche.


Central in this image is a woman with young child (as always). According to recent UNHCR data, around 75% of refugees are actually male, 13% women and 12% children. You can even derive that from the silhouettes in the image below the top image. The first three articles featured are:

  • Refugees ask tough questions to Arwa Damon This article starts with: Amid the fray and all the bodies pressed against the razor wire along the Greece-Macedonia border, fingers dig into my arm. "Please, I am pregnant. Please," the woman said, her eyes filling with tears. "Please, I don't want to lose my baby." The article is emo-porn of the dirtiest, filthiest kind. Never mind that Arwa Damon is a journalist, shouldn't she be the one to ask tough questions? Like: "did you really lose your passport" and "how long did you live in Turkey before coming here"?
  • Syrian in UK faces tough road ahead We read about an immigrant who checked his smartphone to make sure he was in Britain, got a free house and job seekers allowance, but complains he cannot immediately work as a dentist because he fears it will take years to qualify and that he may never pass the written exam. Sorry, but we stopped doing dentistry in barber shops over a century ago. No mention is made whether he even tries to take the required test. He also doesn't want to wash dishes and wants more time on benefits like in Sweden. Life is hard in the UK.
  • Image of drowned boy drives home horror This is not just emo-porn, this has become a sick mixture of pedophilia and necrophilia. We hear a repeat of old lies like that the family of the boy sought asylum in Canada, which Canada denies. CNN is not critical and repeats lies without investigating.

And this crap goes on and on:
  • West 'reaps what is has sown' This article lays the blame on European colonialism (really?) and US invasions to end with the conclusion that European leaders - encouraged by Washington - must recognize their responsibilities, historical and current and take in all these people. Let Washington encourage itself to take in refugees.
  • Do countries have obligations to refugees? This article tries to shove moral and legal "obligations" down the throat of European countries and Gulf States. Israel, which also takes zero refugees and is as compatible with these refugees as Europe, is curiously not mentioned.
  • Why aren't Gulf states taking more refugees in Not a word on Israel which directly borders Syria, is economically well off, is democratic and about as culturally and religiously compatible with these muslims as Europe, yet accepts 0 Syrian refugees without being guilt tripped and called racist.
Image featured on CNN: spot the missing Middle Eastern neighbor of Syria
  • How you can help in the migrant crisis This article provides a list of organisations whom to donate to, so refugees can throw your food aid in the mud for being "not halal". Many of these organization push for EU countries to take all migrants in without exceptions.
  • Why refugees deserve warm welcome This report by Christiane Amanpour focuses on historical examples of refugees who have "enriched" the West. A prominent example is made of a former jewish refugee child, Madeleine Albright. To use this despicable woman as an example is an insult to actual Iraqi refugees as Albright once remarked that 500.000 dead Iraqi children were "worth it":

  • Which countries welcome refugees? Despite the title, the word "welcome" is only mentioned once inside. No country except delusional Sweden (figures) actually appears welcoming.

Summary

Contrast the following screenshot, also taken on September 14 (again focussing on the woman with young child in trouble cliche):

Number of unrelated headline topics: 1
To normal CNN headlines on September 18:

Number of unrelated headline topics: >30
On September 14, Fox News and pretty much all other US media kept multiple headlines focusing mostly on articles relevant to the United States. CNN however, still an American news site but also viewed by many Europeans, chose to focus on this single issue which Americans care little about and with an extremely heavy bias towards an open border policy, as evidenced by:

  1. Refugees instead of reporters asking "tough questions"
  2. Focusing on sob stories and cadaver emo-porn
  3. Blaming "the West"
  4. Portraying the opposition to immigration as horrible (camerawoman)
  5. Claiming "obligations" of EU and Gulf States to accept refugees, omitting Israel
  6. Calling for aid to organizations which seek unlimited immigration
This seems part of a plan endorsed by the EU dictatorship to destroy Europe through immigration and make the rich even richer by depressing wages through an influx of low skilled laborers.

Summary


As conclusion: don't go to CNN for news, go there for brainwashing and irrelevant clickbait crap.

Thursday, September 17, 2015

Despicable ugly old Stasi hag to help German Thought Police to censor Facebook

Anetta Kahane worked from 1974 to 1982 under the code name "Victoria" as secret agent for the East German security service Stasi. 
The German government is about to establish a special censorship group dedicated to identifying and deleting immigration-critical messages on Facebook. To help with this task the government has included a former agent for the East German secret service Stasi. That she was a ratting to the Stasi is not exactly a secret, it is well known and even on her German wikipedia entry (use Google translate): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anetta_Kahane.

The German Minister of Justice, Heiko Maas, published an open letter to Facebook in August 2015 requesting that the social networking service starts to systematically erase "xenophobic" material. The minister has now drawn up a plan on how the censorship will happen. A special work group will deal with deleting of comments. The working group's members are appointed by both the Government and Facebook, but also the organization Network Against Nazis ("Netz gegen Nazis") has been invited. The network was founded in 2007 by Amadeu Antonio Stiftung, and is led by left-wing activist Anetta Kahane (pictured).

From 1974-1982, Kahane worked under the code name "Victoria" as a secret agent for the East German security service Stasi where she ratted on other citizens out of line with party ideology. Today, Anetta Kahane works as a professional "anti-racist", and attracted attention last year after after an interview with RT, having proclaimed that the European countries have to open their borders and to adapt fully to the immigrants from the Third World:

Immigration is the future. We really need to change the immigration policy in Europe. This is very important, you have to adapt the education system and adapting countries' self-understanding. They are no longer just white or just Swedes, or only Portuguese or German. They are multicultural places in the world, she said.
Source: http://speisa.com/modules/articles/index.php/item.1926/stasi-veteran-to-manage-censorship-on-facebook.html

Why am I not surprised her last name is Kahane? Anyway, there you have it people: Devila Merkel is fed up of your criticism of her immigration policy. This traitor of her own country has had enough and will start to censor racist and xenophobic Facebook messages. What constitutes racist and xenophobic will be up to politicians. Give it some time, and soon enough all criticism of islam and immigration policy will be illegal.

Devila Merkel

Friday, September 11, 2015

UK Minitruth subsidiary Daily Mail says we've always been at war with Eastasia

That's Putin in the cockpit
The Daily Mail has an article today about the interception of Russian bombers. These things happen regularly anyway. So what's so special this time to make it a headline? That's right, Russia intervening on behalf of Assad. Previously, the Daily Mail had an article on Russian troops in Syria. An excerpt:

These revealing pictures apparently show how Russian troops are already on the ground in Syria as Vladimir Putin allegedly defies the West.
The images showing boots on the ground were originally posted on social media accounts of military personnel, but some were then hastily withdrawn once they began being noticed.
The shocking pictures will be seen as proof that despite official denials from the Russian president Vladimir Putin, he has deployed increasing numbers of troops to help prop up the regime of Syrian premier Bashar Al-Assad. 
The pictures will infuriate western leaders who have called for the removal of Assad during the four-year civil war that has devastated the country, forced four million people to flee their homes and led to the terrifying rise of ISIS. 

Considering the way this is written, I bet the expected public reaction was that commentators would call Putin evil. However, many commentators on the Daily Mail article approved instead, not falling for the trick that less than twelve airstrikes a day on ISIS by the west is going to do anything.




Ofcourse the previously mentioned "western leaders" were probably even more infuriated that their populace was dissenting. The public had to be reminded that Putin is the bad guy. What better way than to publish a story about an intercept of a Russian bomber, which is routine anyway? Lo and behold, it is working. The gullible masses are having their two minutes hate session against Putin. There are even idiots suggesting Britain should shoot these planes out of international airspace, where they have every right of being, to "send a message" or because supposedly "Russia would do the same if British bombers came near Russia". Mission accomplished.


Perpetual war: US warns Russia to back off Syria


The US and NATO pretend that fewer than 12 airstrikes a day will make this problem go away
The US government seems quite fond of perpetual war, as a means to keep up its military spending and to keep its populace docile. The US government, a two party system more perverse than the communist one party system as it creates the illusion of choice, has brought us previously the overthrowal of Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi. The first was done without a wider support across the world, so learning a lesson, the US government aimed to give the overthrowal of Gaddafi at least a small flavor of legitimacy by using NATO.

A word for my fellow Europeans: NATO was originally created to oppose the forces of the Soviet Union and to "protect" Europe (actually US economic interests and military supremacy) from the USSR. After the dissolution of the USSR in 1991, US troops however did not withdraw. Support of the people for the stationing of US troops is probably non existent except around those bases itself as a support to the local economy. Opposition is however also non existent as the US government is still viewed, if not as a friend, at least as an ally. The reality however is that NATO is an occupation force with very little legitimacy. If it ever came to a referendum whether US troops should stay, it is doubtful the "yes" camp would win. Only with the recent crisis in Ukraine, the European people are again becoming convinced brainwashed that a stronger NATO is necessary.

In any case, both of these events, the Iraq war and the "military intervention" in Libya, have led to a massive influx of refugees economic migrants into Europe. The people of Europe are suffering the consequences of the agenda of the US government and the barely elected dictatorship of the EU which forces these migrants upon us. Now Russia wants to send aid to Assad and the US is obstructing.

Perpetual bad guys

It is time for people of Europe to wake up and realize the following things:

  1. The US government is neither a "friend" nor an "ally"
  2. The US government is not here to protect us from Russia
  3. NATO is a military occupation force
  4. The EU government does not listen to the people that barely elected them
Both governments, US and EU, only contribute to worsening the problem. The media aid and abet them in their propaganda struggle by depicting Putin and Assad as the bad guys in a very simplified manner and by focusing on the few women and children among the probably 75% male refugees economic migrants.



Tuesday, September 8, 2015

US Minitruth subsidiary CNN distracts you from that other Middle Eastern country

The US Minitruth subsidiary organization CNN has an item trying to force Syrian refugees down the throat of Europe and Gulf Nations, entitled: Are countries obligated to take in refugees? In some cases, yes.

It focuses on the supposed duties of certain countries like Europe and the rich Gulf States that are supposed to take in vast numbers of refugees. It uses imagery of women and children on the cover, to play on the emotions:

Won't somebody please think of the children?

Reality is different, the overwhelming majority of refugees (Newspeak word for economic migrants) are men and less than half are actually Syrians running away from war as is evidenced by contradictory images inside the article:

Some more "women and children"

Disclaimer: CNN not responsible for using correct lighting in this picture of Syrian war refugees. Subjects' color may vary. 

Frequently mentioned by the various US Minitruth subsidiaries is this image or variants thereof:

Spot the Syria neighbor missing from the blame game. Where is Waldo Schlomo?
This image, provided to you by the US Minitruth, shows every single country neighboring Syria except one.

It is not difficult to find out which country this is. It is nevertheless a safe country, a prosperous country and actually the only real democracy in the Middle East. Yet in the media, this country rarely ever gets mentioned as having any responsibility in taking up some of these refugees. I am sure that if you ask why this is, it will be mentioned that their cultures are not compatible or whatever bullshit excuse. Israel is equally culturally compatible with these refugees as Europe.

Everyone: feel free to redistribute the illustration below on Tumblr, Facebook, wherever. It is time for counterpropaganda.


UK Minitruth subsidiary Daily Mail distracts you from the refugee crisis

Today is September 8, 1984 2015. In the news in the Daily Mail we find two suspicious articles.

One is about British jihadis killed in a drone strike on August 21. Very old news, but probably released to raise Cameron's approval ratings, just as he has agreed to import lots of Syrian (and anyone who "lost" his passport) refugees. Plenty of commentators are praising Cameron. Naive fools.

Another is about "hate crimes" against muslims on the rise in Britain. Central to the story is Tasneem Kabir, an innocent muslim woman who suffered broken teeth and a smashed lip after she was hit in an unprovoked attack by Michael Ayoade. Now if Ayode doesn't sound like a British name, it's because it isn't. Ayode is originally from Nigeria, we do not know his religion nor even if he was christian, what his motive was for this attack, which happened three years ago but is news now. But the message is clear: the British are racist towards muslims and all critics of the refugee invasion are bad, bad people whose opinion is invalid. Luckily, many commentators are smart enough in this case to see the lies of the Minitruth.